Home

Non Profit Site

Site Map

A web site for Egyptian Architects and planners, and everybody interested in Egyptian Art and Architecture.
It represents the Egyptian's contributions to the world of Architecture; projects, contemporary and historical buildings, papers, articles, books, thesis or software.

 
Discussion about Gourna sec. 2

Subject: Re: el Gourna, we 2akl el 3eesh
From: oud kabreeet

Dear tarek & 3abbas
all the architects I know (talabet 3omara es7aby ya3ny) looks at me be7teqar when I say something about 7assan Fat7y the greatest architect, although every one in the country looks at him as the symbol of architects in Egypt, this Great man Mesh Mali 3een betoo3 3emarah!
Is that because they understand things about him higher than the level of our riveted steel heads?
(demaghna el mebarshemah) or is it just 3'eerah men elragel 3alashan 3amal
7aggah 3aleeha el 2eemah, mesh shewayet sanadee2 we 3elab Kabreet (zay beetna) elly el me3maryeen el 2afadel 3amleenoh!
I thought that architects talk from the tip of their noses (men tartoofet mana7'eerhom) about civil
engineers only (el gahala elly ma beyefhamoosh felfann), but I discovered that they do the same with
each other, I think that the grandpa of Tarek was right when he said about them:
Mabeye3gebhomsh el 3agab walla el kalam men dahab!

3ood Kabreet
taleb Gahel men betoo3 madany.


Subject: Re: el Gourna, we 2akl el 3eesh
From: Tarek Rashed

Abou hamied el shahier be 3oud.....

El 3amlia mosh a7takar wela takaber 3la sho'3el el ragel, more that it is trying to seek a practical solution to our problems.... therefore, for myself, I see 7assan fata7y is a great Egyptian Architect, but this doesn't imply that the theory his introduced is applicable now or can be the vehicle to solve our problems. When I was doing my Masters, I remember that one of the English professors said in his first lecture that there is a big difference between good science and useful science. The former sometimes can be fascinated and people who do it really are genius, but unfortunately they don't help much in solving the real world problems. Let me give you an example, during the 70s there was a well known problem that some mathematicians were trying to solve it out, which basically find a mathematical proof the minimum number of colors that can be used to color a random array of polygons (the map of the world for example) such that the same color can not be located in two adjacent polygon. And that was a big debate between them, until it was solved by a Dutch guy who used the computer which was new in that time to find the number and the answer was just 4 colors, and after he did that, he wrote in the conclusion of his paper, that his motivation in doing that was to let those scientists move on to do more "useful" stuff. Here is the states, all the academic world surviving on the grants and the funds made by federal agencies like NASA and National Science Foundation, and till last year the evaluation criteria used to examine the proposals in terms of its scientific value. But since the mid 0f the last year, the Congress agreed on a new item which doesn't allow any project to be funded if it doesn't have a DIRECT impact of the improving the quality of life and well-being of the American Community...

Back to Hassan Fata7y... if we borrowed my ex-professor statement, so we can say Good Architecture is great, but we need useful architecture. The design of Hassan fatahy is great, but if its applications are not appropriate. Not just the environmental consequence of his design that I pointed to in the last email. But I will give you another example that I touched closely. I remember a name of a lady called Zieneb EL kady that was fascinated with Hassan Fatahy (and she was one among his group before he dies and even used to cite his words) and she got funded from UNESCO to establish a school of el ma3marieen to follow him and I worked in her project for training for some time between 3 and 4 3amara, and she was trying to build a model (FI MAKER WEZARET EL ZRA3A) so people can visit it and gives a life and "near" example of his architecture. The funny thing that the model she built has a concrete foundation (the constructing Engineer belmonsaba was mo3ied fi Madeny el kahira) which basically violates what Hassan fat'hy was calling for, and then to do the final touches to this one story model she brought some guys from Nubia to do the work. The end cost of the building was 3 times higher than if it was built in the convention way. So basically this Hassan fat'hy model, didn't meet any of what Hassan Fat'hy was calling to, la hia 3omraet fokara weala hia men el local materials (and by the way, it is still there and you can visit it at any time) and take of course Kariet el sa7fieen elly fi el sahel el shamaley. And even in the states, he did that village in New Mexico, but his theory didn't spread at all, although especially in the states they are practical and then they see any thing useful to them it spread like cancer.

To finish up, again, I see Hassan fatah7 ma3amary kadeer and fanan mohob, but my critique is not for him, but his idea is not applicable now. And as I said before, if he introduced them now, it might not find this big propaganda it met before.............................

Tarek


Subject: Re: el Gourna, we 2akl el 3eesh
From: Amr

Ahlan ya Ostaz 3ood,
First I am neither an architect nor a madany guy... I am an economist who is into some other things from time to time...
About Hassan Fathy.. I do not know what are you commenting about.. who said what.. However, It doesn't mean that you are speaking from tarateef manakheerak, if you criticize Hassan Fathy's theories... you are a madany guy, so may you please tell me how practical it is to apply Fatjhy's theories in urban surroundings... the beauty of Fathy's theories goes with the back to nature theories that denounce European achievements... they were embraced mainly by anthropologists and by orient lists who think that Elshark shark wa lGharb gharb wa lan yaltaqeya... Fathy named his book architecture of the poor.... do you know how many times more (in terms of expenditures) does it take to build a Fathy's style building compared to a normal modern one... it is something nice no doubt but it is non practical even for the original dwellers of the places Fathy concentrated on... Gurna's Fathy buildings are now deserted... the theories about natural cooling, economic lighting, and so on proved to be just NICE but not sufficient...
Any ways I want to draw your attention to a new book of Omar Hakeem, one of Fathy's most loyal Students and assistants on Nubian Architecture... I got it from Catacomb gallery in Maadi... I am not sure where else you can buy it but it is a very important book, also Hakeem intends to publish a prolonged interview with Fathy (he is now working into translating it into Arabic....

Regards
Amr

top

Discussion sec. 1

Biography - Projects - Research - Discussions - Articles - Bibliography

 

 

 

 

  Editor's Note

 
For several millenniums, Egyptians have lead the Architecture of the whole world, this bright history actually puts a load on our shoulders as contemporary Egyptian Architects and planners, if we really want to be proud of our ancestors, we have to do a positive step to regain the lead, or at least stop being lagging behind the whole world!

For more than two centuries now, we have been just importing Architectural ideas and technologies from the west (as we have been doing in all aspects of our life), and for no more than 50 years we began to explore our Architectural heritage to find a new source to learn. The step forward, which should be taken now, is to digest all resources of knowledge, and to introduce to the world a new Contemporary Egyptian Architecture:

OUR ARCHITECTURE!

This will not be done by a single person, it needs the cooperation of hundreds of minds and hands, may be a whole generation of Architects and Intellectuals have to contribute to such a process till we find a solid product.

That's why this site has been created.

To provide a link and an Information source to everybody who wants to contribute, and to open a gate to publish ideas and discuss them with others. It is open for any contribution, any Architect who wants to publish his work: projects, articles, papers or thesis, is welcome. It's also open for any news, or announcements about conferences, seminars, competitions, expositions or new products.

We welcome anyone want to share us, or want to publish his work in the site, just send us an email to know the way of publishing your works, papers, articles, ...etc.